Min side Kundeservice Bli medlem

Why We Argue (And How We Should)

A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason

«

"Why We Argue, Second Edition is a timely and important book. The inability to have productive discussions on matters on which we deeply disagree poses a threat to our democracy, and it can affect our mental health as citizens as well. In their wide-ranging discussion, Aikin and Talisse characterize the nature of the challenges involved, and they make useful suggestions as to how we might go about addressing them. I highly recommend their book."

-Sanford Goldberg, Northwestern University

"Why We Argue (and How We Should), Second Edition continues to provide a superb introduction to reasoned argumentation and an explanation of why it is the lifeblood of healthy democratic practice. This well-timed edition equips readers with additional tools for analyzing when democratic discourse is derailed. Those who would contribute to the revitalization of democratic practice by taking responsibility for their own deliberative obligations will find genial guides in Aikin and Talisse."

-Lawrence Torcello, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA

»

Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. Les mer

2448,-
Sendes innen 21 dager

Logg inn for å se din bonus

Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason presents an accessible and engaging introduction to the theory of argument, with special emphasis on the way argument works in public political debate. The authors develop a view according to which proper argument is necessary for one's individual cognitive health; this insight is then expanded to the collective health of one's society. Proper argumentation, then, is seen to play a central role in a well-functioning democracy.


Written in a lively style and filled with examples drawn from the real world of contemporary politics, and questions following each chapter to encourage discussion, Why We Argue (And How We Should) reads like a guide for the participation in, and maintenance of, modern democracy. An excellent student resource for courses in critical thinking, political philosophy, and related fields, Why We Argue (And How We Should) is an important contribution to reasoned debate.


What's New in the Second Edition:








Updated examples throughout the book, including examples from the 2016 U.S. election and first years of the Trump presidency;







Expanded coverage of dialectical fallacies, including coverage of new types of fallacies and of sites where such fallacies thrive (e.g., cable news, social media);







Revised For Further Thought questions and definitions of Key Terms, included at the end of each chapter;







The addition of five new chapters:









Deep Disagreement







Argument by Analogy







Argument between the Ads







The Owl of Minerva (or weaponizing metalanguage)







Argumentative Responsibility and Repair.

Detaljer

Forlag
Routledge
Innbinding
Innbundet
Språk
Engelsk
Sider
218
ISBN
9781138087415
Utgave
2. utg.
Utgivelsesår
2018
Format
23 x 15 cm

Anmeldelser

«

"Why We Argue, Second Edition is a timely and important book. The inability to have productive discussions on matters on which we deeply disagree poses a threat to our democracy, and it can affect our mental health as citizens as well. In their wide-ranging discussion, Aikin and Talisse characterize the nature of the challenges involved, and they make useful suggestions as to how we might go about addressing them. I highly recommend their book."

-Sanford Goldberg, Northwestern University

"Why We Argue (and How We Should), Second Edition continues to provide a superb introduction to reasoned argumentation and an explanation of why it is the lifeblood of healthy democratic practice. This well-timed edition equips readers with additional tools for analyzing when democratic discourse is derailed. Those who would contribute to the revitalization of democratic practice by taking responsibility for their own deliberative obligations will find genial guides in Aikin and Talisse."

-Lawrence Torcello, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA

»

Medlemmers vurdering

Oppdag mer

Bøker som ligner på Why We Argue (And How We Should):

Se flere

Logg inn

Ikke medlem ennå? Registrer deg her

Glemt medlemsnummer/passord?

Handlekurv