Doing Justice to History
Confronting the Past in International Criminal Courts
«This book offers an astute account of how history is being constructed in international courtrooms. It shows how historical narratives by international criminal courts are neither static nor final, and it argues that international judgments should not be seen as historical endpoints but rather as discursive beginnings. The book is brilliant in its nuanced approach and convincing through its meticulous argumentation.»
Larissa van den Herik, Professor of Public International Law, Leiden University
As communities struggle to make sense of mass atrocities, expectations have increasingly been placed on international criminal courts to render authoritative historical accounts of episodes of mass violence. Les mer
1759,-
Innbundet
Sendes innen 21 dager
Logg inn for å se din bonus
As communities struggle to make sense of mass atrocities, expectations have increasingly been placed on international criminal courts to render authoritative historical accounts of episodes of mass violence. Taking these expectations as its point of departure, this book seeks to understand international criminal courts through the prism of their historical function. The book critically examines how such courts confront the past by constructing historical narratives
concerning both the culpability of the accused on trial and the broader mass atrocity contexts in which they are alleged to have participated.
The book argues that international criminal courts are host to struggles for historical justice, discursive contests between different actors vying for judicial acknowledgement of their interpretations of the past. By examining these struggles within different institutional settings, the book uncovers the legitimating qualities of international criminal judgments. In particular, it illuminates what tends to be foregrounded and included within, as well as marginalised and excluded from, the
narratives of international criminal courts in practice. What emerges from this account is a sense of the significance of thinking about the emancipatory limits and possibilities of international criminal courts in terms of the historical narratives that are constructed and contested within and beyond
the courtroom.
concerning both the culpability of the accused on trial and the broader mass atrocity contexts in which they are alleged to have participated.
The book argues that international criminal courts are host to struggles for historical justice, discursive contests between different actors vying for judicial acknowledgement of their interpretations of the past. By examining these struggles within different institutional settings, the book uncovers the legitimating qualities of international criminal judgments. In particular, it illuminates what tends to be foregrounded and included within, as well as marginalised and excluded from, the
narratives of international criminal courts in practice. What emerges from this account is a sense of the significance of thinking about the emancipatory limits and possibilities of international criminal courts in terms of the historical narratives that are constructed and contested within and beyond
the courtroom.
Detaljer
- Forlag
- Oxford University Press
- Innbinding
- Innbundet
- Språk
- Engelsk
- ISBN
- 9780198846871
- Utgivelsesår
- 2021
- Format
- 24 x 16 cm
Anmeldelser
«This book offers an astute account of how history is being constructed in international courtrooms. It shows how historical narratives by international criminal courts are neither static nor final, and it argues that international judgments should not be seen as historical endpoints but rather as discursive beginnings. The book is brilliant in its nuanced approach and convincing through its meticulous argumentation.»
Larissa van den Herik, Professor of Public International Law, Leiden University
«This book is a well-informed, meticulously researched and incessantly inquisitive contribution to what might be broadly characterised as the historiography of international criminal law. How do international criminal courts go about constructing historical narratives, how are these histories received and what happens to history after its encounter with international law, and international law after its encounter with history? By offering us a series of deft and sometimes pugnacious answers to these questions, Dr Sander enriches the field considerably.»
Gerry Simpson, Professor of Public International Law, LSE
«In Doing Justice to History, Barrie Sander moves us well beyond familiar debates over whether international criminal courts (or any courts for that matter) should narrate history, by masterfully and compellingly demonstrating how international criminal courts not only produce but legitimate impoverished historical accounts. While largely skeptical of the many biases of international criminal law that manifest in its history-making, Sander also suggests the emancipatory potential of approaching the judicial production of history as a site of critical inquiry rather than as an end. Lawyers, historians, and social theorists interested in the law or memory of armed conflict, crimes against humanity, and genocide will want to read this book.»
Karen Engle, Chair in Law, The University of Texas at Austin
«Milan Kundera writes that we 'pass through the present with our eyes blindfolded,' and it is only when that blindfold 'is untied' that we can 'glance at the past' and discover its meaning. In this book for the ages, Barrie Sander unties international criminal law's blindfold. Sander adroitly shows what sense law can, and cannot, make of history.»
Mark A. Drumbl, Professor of Law, Washington and Lee University